Re: [Gems-users] question about install ruby on Solaris

[Rishi Jain <rjain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think it might be the reason for the failure i am seeing as well:

Linking ruby.so
/usr/pubsw/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/pubsw/lib/libz.so when
searching for -lz
/usr/pubsw/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/pubsw/lib/libz.a when
searching for -lz
/afs/ir.stanford.edu/users/r/j/rjain/ee382a_project/GEMS/simics-2.2.19/v9-sol8-64/bin/libsimics-common.so:
file not recognized: File format not recognized
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake[2]: ***
[/afs/ir.stanford.edu/users/r/j/rjain/ee382a_project/GEMS/simics-2.2.19/v9-sol8-64/lib/ruby.so]
Error 1



Any suggestions?

thanks
rishi

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 lxue@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi, All,
>   I meet some trouble when I try to install ruby on Solaris.
> For solaris, the host for simics is v9-sol8-64, but for the gcc
> installed in my Solaris machine, libraries such as libstdc++.so.5 and
> libgcc_s.so are 32-bit. So I have to change something to compile ruby
> for 32-bit. (From Min Xu's help, I know ruby is default compiled for 64-bit).
> So my question is that, if the simics itself is 64-bit, and I compile ruby
> for 32-bit, I think it should be mismatch. But I can not find simics for
> 32-bit
> (I mean something like v9-sol8-32).
> How to deal this mismatch? Does anyone has some experiences on how to install
> gems on a Solaris machins?
>
> Thanks
>
> -- Liping
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>