Re: [Gems-users] more questions on gems setup

[Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>]

You will want to go back to API_2.0...the valid options recognized by 
simics are API_1.0, API_2.0, and (for Simics 3.0) API_3.0
Rishi Jain wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using simics2.2 and gems 1.2 on a solaris machine
> With all the help from this list (especially mike), the make went further,
> but failed with
> "wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32"
> I was using -m64 for compilation as well as linking. I removed the
> switches, and it went even further.
>
> Now, its failing with:
> === Building module "ruby" ===
> Linking ruby.so
> /usr/pubsw/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/pubsw/lib/libz.so when
> searching for -lz
> /usr/pubsw/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/pubsw/lib/libz.a when
> searching for -lz
> /afs/ir.stanford.edu/users/r/j/rjain/ee382a_project/GEMS/simics-2.2.19/v9-sol8-64/bin/libsimics-common.so:
> file not recognized: File format not recognized
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
>
> Should I used simics2.0 instead of 2.2 (by the way, I changed the step 5
> in setup guide :
> ruby | API_2.2 | v9
> opal | API_2.2 | v9
>
> let me know if this change is alright, or do i need to go back to API_2.0
>
>
>
> thanks again for your help
> rishi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>