Re: [DynInst_API:] Telling DynInst a particular function is non-returning


Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 08:24:46 -0500
From: John Mellor-Crummey <johnmc@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [DynInst_API:] Telling DynInst a particular function is non-returning
Xiaozhu,

Would this handling of non-return functions be fixed by the patch that you sent to me for PPC?

--
John Mellor-Crummey

(sent from my phone)

On Mar 15, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Thomas Dullien <thomasdullien@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey there,

ok, rebuilding DynInst 9.3.2 now to investigate why adding the string does not seem to have any effect.
I looked at the source code, and I *think* the function is already in the list of non-returning functions.

Checking what is going on. Example setup:

.plt.got:0000000000053CF8 __stack_chk_fail proc near              ; CODE XREF: init:loc_54673âp
.plt.got:0000000000053CF8                                         ; uninit:loc_54705âp ...
.plt.got:0000000000053CF8                 jmp     cs:__stack_chk_fail_ptr
.plt.got:0000000000053CF8 __stack_chk_fail endp

.text:00000000000A4290 var_8           = qword ptr -8
.text:00000000000A4290
.text:00000000000A4290 graph = rdi                             ; AVFilterGraph_0 *
.text:00000000000A4290 flags = rsi                             ; unsigned int
.text:00000000000A4290 ; __unwind {
.text:00000000000A4290                 push    rax
.text:00000000000A4291                 mov     rax, fs:28h
.text:00000000000A429A                 mov     [rsp+8+var_8], rax
.text:00000000000A429E                 mov     [graph+5Ch], esi
.text:00000000000A42A1                 mov     rax, fs:28h
.text:00000000000A42AA                 cmp     rax, [rsp+8+var_8]
.text:00000000000A42AE                 jnz     short loc_A42B2
.text:00000000000A42B0                 pop     rax
.text:00000000000A42B1                 retn
.text:00000000000A42B2 ; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
.text:00000000000A42B2
.text:00000000000A42B2 loc_A42B2:                              ; CODE XREF: avfilter_graph_set_auto_convert+1Eâj
.text:00000000000A42B2                 call    __stack_chk_fail
.text:00000000000A42B2 ; } // starts at A4290
.text:00000000000A42B2 avfilter_graph_set_auto_convert endp

DynInst for some reason does not interpret the tailing call as non-return. Digging to see what is going on,
will update here as I learn more :)

Cheers,
Thomas


On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Xiaozhu Meng <mxz297@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:06 AM, Thomas Dullien <thomasdullien@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey there,

ok, I have looked at a few options on how to best tackle this, and would love to solicit advice :-)

- I tried SymtabCodeSource::addNonReturning("__stack_chk_fail"); this did not seem to have an effect.

If you call SymtabCodeSource::addNonReturning("__stack_chk_fail") before calling CodeObject::parse(), this should work. 
 
- Looked at set_retstatus -- but that implies that the code is already parsed?

You are right that after CodeObject::parse() has finished, calling set_retstatus will only change the flag of return status for this function, will not re-parse the binary. So, we can focus on why SymtabCodeSource::addNonReturning("__stack_chk_fail") does not work. 


 

Cheers,
Thomas


On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Thomas Dullien <thomasdullien@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah. No. I just fund set_retstatus :-) -- please ignore my question :-)

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Thomas Dullien <thomasdullien@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey there,

after having my coffee, I realized: The proper way to do this is to derive from CodeSource
and overload the nonReturning functions, I guess? :)

Cheers,
Thomas

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Thomas Dullien <thomasdullien@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey there,

I am running into troubles with disassembling executables generated by
clang.3.8.1-24, for x64, with optimization set to size-optimize and stack cookies
enabled.

The trouble is that any function with an enabled stack cookie will end with a sequence
of:

  Epilogue to check stack cookie
  jnz .fail
  Rest of epilogue.
  retn
.fail:
  call __stack_checkfail     // Does not return

This leads to DynInst lumping all consecutive functions that use stack cookies
into one huge CFG.

Is there a way to tell DynInst that a particular function is not returning? I found
that the parseAPI allows me to query if a function returns, but I did not find anything
to "override" this behavior?

Cheers,
Thomas




_______________________________________________
Dyninst-api mailing list
Dyninst-api@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api


_______________________________________________
Dyninst-api mailing list
Dyninst-api@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]