Re: [DynInst_API:] [RFC PATCH] Cleanup warnings

[Peter Foley <pefoley2@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Bill Williams <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'll give this one a more detailed look tomorrow. Unused params in temporary stubs are fine to silence via anonymizing parameters; unused error codes need good handling. And I'm mostly okay with comparisons that can't fail when they're making the facts being asserted more legible.
>
> I really need to check the dead code in context and make sure we're not missing functionality in a stupid way, too.

Sure, I marked this one as RFC for a reason.
I *think* I figured out everything, but it's entirely possible that I
missed something.
I'd be more than happy to split this up if needed.