Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH 1/2] Reduce namespace pollution


Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:05:41 -0700
From: Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH 1/2] Reduce namespace pollution
On 04/23/2016 12:57 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
> Don't unconditionally include all of namespace std

I agree it's good practice avoid "using namespace std;" in API headers,
so you don't force that on the library's users.

However, IMO removing std from all the source files is needless churn.
It's perfectly fine for a project to unconditionally use std internally
as many projects do, and as dyninst has for a long time.

Is there a real problem you're trying to solve here?

[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]