Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:58:37 -0400 |
---|---|
From: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] DynInst Overhead |
Hi - > [...] I was using the CodeCoverage tool [2] for > instrumentation. But it's taking way too higher time than the > unprofiled run. (More than a 50x slow down) [...] Are you measuring steady-state overheads only, or else are you including the one-time analysis too? The latter can be quite large, but you pay it only once per startup. - FChE |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [DynInst_API:] DynInst Overhead, Buddhika Chamith Kahawitage Don |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] DynInst Overhead, Buddhika Chamith Kahawitage Don |
Previous by Thread: | [DynInst_API:] DynInst Overhead, Buddhika Chamith Kahawitage Don |
Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] DynInst Overhead, Buddhika Chamith Kahawitage Don |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |