Re: [condor-users] Condor vs. PBS for linux cluster: anyexperiences?

[Mark Silberstein <marks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi
The only reason for not using Condor for this would be absence of
prioritized queue, since dedicated scheduler does not honor these
priorities ;(
>From this point of view, using PBS + Maui is a nice solution, since it
also provides reservation, etc.etc.
However from the usability point view, Condor is undoubtedly the best.
I think you should try both, and see what users tell.My users liked
Condor more than PBS;)
Mark
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 14:02, Mark Calleja wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We're in the process of commissioning a dedicated linux cluster (16 
> nodes), mainly to run coupled MPI jobs, and in the past such a machine 
> would have had PBS together with the relevant MPI libraries installed. 
> However, we could just as easily run a dedicated Condor pool for the 
> individual nodes and run jobs within an MPI universe. Are people aware 
> of any strong reasons for or against migrating to such a solution?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> Condor Support Information:
> http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/condor-support/
> To Unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with
> unsubscribe condor-users <your_email_address>
> 

Condor Support Information:
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/condor-support/
To Unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe condor-users <your_email_address>