| Hi Thomas, Thanks for assisting.
When you say âgroup (hierarchical) weightsâ do you mean with the first configuration (including the subgroups in GROUP_NAMES) or the second one?
This is what it looks like for configuration 2 (no subgroups in GROUP_NAMES) $ condor_userprio -hierarchical -quota Last Priority Update: 11/19 10:14 Group Effective Config Use Subtree Weighted Name Quota Quota Surplus Quota Requested --------------------------- --------- --------- ------- --------- ---------- <none> 443.61 0.00 yes 14787.00 4569 group_alice 1182.96 0.08 ByQuota 1182.96 2458 group_atlas 6062.67 0.41 ByQuota 6062.67 14506 group_dune 1330.83 0.09 ByQuota 1330.83 19 group_enmr 1330.83 0.09 ByQuota 1330.83 834 group_gw 1330.83 0.09 ByQuota 1330.83 71 group_lhcb 2957.40 0.20 ByQuota 2957.40 1 group_ops 147.87 0.01 ByQuota 147.87 1 --------------------------- --------- --------- ------- --------- ---------- Number of users: 16 Thatâs another thing I forgot to mention : âWeighted Requestedâ is not documented in the man page or documentation; it appears to be the total number of slots worth of jobs for that group that are either currently running or sitting waiting in the queue. I also donât know how to have it tell me what the effective usage is, to compare to the effective quota, so I know what the âstarvation orderâ of the scheduler should be and can check that thatâs what it is really doing. JT |