Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HTCondor-users] Future improvements to NUMA affinity algorithms
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:51:03 +0000
- From: Jaime Frey <jfrey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] Future improvements to NUMA affinity algorithms
My suspicion is that this wonât have much effect on the difference in CPU scheduling efficiency between ASSIGN_CPU_AFFINITY and cgroups for enforcing CPU usage limitations.
HTCondor will still ignore NUMA locality when selecting which cores to assign to a job.
And ASSIGN_CPU_AFFINITY doesnât allow a job to use additional cores when theyâre idle (if job has more processes/threads than assigned cores).
- Jaime
> On Jul 30, 2025, at 4:00âAM, Valerio Bellizzomi <valerio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today on Phoronix I read this:
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.17-NUMA-Locality-Random__;!!Mak6IKo!PqQT_f5zicZdSyBzgbJkmFMR5W6nhqLtSL4Z-QzBjNtrZErhK1QMrAFKCgpblPubjZHjM9saI78BCD8wXg$
>
>
> Should this improve things when using the ASSIGN_CPU_AFFINITY knob, and
> perhaps without forcing things via cgroups ?
>
>
> Thanks
> Valerio
>