Re: [HTCondor-users] 10 to 23 upgrade order

[Tim Theisen <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Gerard,

The upgrade order should not matter. Starting with the central manager is a logical choice.

I don't know what issue you had, perhaps a subtle difference in configuration?

...Tim

On 12/13/23 14:44, Weatherby,Gerard wrote:

Our configuration is:
   One central manager

  One access point

Around 50 combined submit / execute nodes

A handful (around 8) execute only nodes

I tried upgrading the central manager from 10 to 23, and it all went kaput. Since the central manager is virtual I was able to restore the central manager to its 10 version and the system worked again.

Is there a different order I should be upgrading 10 to 23 in?

_______________________________________________
HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users

The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/

-- 
Tim Theisen (he, him, his)
Release Manager
HTCondor & Open Science Grid
Center for High Throughput Computing
Department of Computer Sciences
University of Wisconsin - Madison
4261 Computer Sciences and Statistics
1210 W Dayton St
Madison, WI 53706-1685
+1 608 265 5736