Hi Vikrant,
have you checked for more matching details with
 Â> condor_q -better-analyze job.id
that should give a bit more details
vice versa, with -reverse-analyze/-better-analyze:reverse you can
compare a machine/slot against a job's requirements.
Cheers,
 ÂThomas
On 07/11/2022 15.08, Vikrant Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>
> We have seen issues where some jobs of the batch stays in idle status, We are using scheduler level splitting.
>
> Let's say a batch of 300 jobs is submitted, cores are available to do match making of let's say 280-290 jobs, negotiator do the match making of 280 jobs, 20 jobs stay in idle status even when the cores are available in the cluster but if we submit new batch it's getting scheduled immediately.
>
> IsHTcondor also considering the time spent by the job in the queue before scheduling, maybe it's considering new jobs more quickly?
>
> Time spent by jobs in queue sometimes goes upto 45 mins despite having cores available in cluster.
>
> Master logs only show no match found for 20 idle jobs but it can find resources for new jobs.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Vikrant Aggarwal
>
> _______________________________________________
> HTCondor-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
> subject: Unsubscribe
> You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users
>
> The archives can be found at:
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/
_______________________________________________
HTCondor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users
The archives can be found at:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/