Hi Maarten and Brian, in my case it was a broken switch between enabling the development repo in favour of the stable one in my puppet manifest (we have some requirements on the dev series). Cheers, Thomas On 16/07/2020 14.26, Brian Lin wrote: > Hi Maarten, > > Similar to HTCondor, HTCondor-CE has two release series: > > Development (latest 4.4.0): > https://htcondor-ce.readthedocs.io/en/latest/releases/ > Stable (latest 3.4.2): https://htcondor-ce.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ > > HTCondor-CE 4 is tested against HTCondor 8.9.x and you'll need to have > the two installed together if you want the latest features (e.g. > SciToken/WLCG token support). That being said, we try our best to make > sure development versions of HTCondor-CE work with the stable versions > of HTCondor (many OSG sites run this way) so I'm a little surprised that > a "version mismatch" was the culprit here. > > - Brian > > On 7/16/20 6:23 AM, Maarten Litmaath wrote: >> Hi Thomas, all, >> 8.8.x (even) is stable, 8.9.y (odd) is development --> big differences >> can be expected... >> >> For a production service you should typically disable the development >> repo, >> but in this case it appears htcondor-ce-4.4.0 needs something that is not >> provided by the latest production release? >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: HTCondor-users [htcondor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of >> Thomas Hartmann [thomas.hartmann@xxxxxxx] >> Sent: 16 July 2020 10:35 >> To: HTCondor-Users Mail List >> Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] HTCondorCE schedd not found >> >> ah, sorry - forgot about the obvious and did not check the versions... ð >> >> indeed, the broken 'new' CE was running on condor v8.8.9 and condor-ce >> v4.4.0 while the working CE was on condor v8.9.7 and condor-ce v4.4.0 - >> so the Condor minor version (security?) caused apparently my troubles. >> >> Anyway, I fixed a minor bug in my repo/package deployement ;) >> >> Cheers and thanks, >> ÂÂ Thomas >> >> >> [client] >> condor-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-classads-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-external-libs-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-procd-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> htcondor-ce-client-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> python2-condor-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> >> [Condor CE broken] >> condor-8.8.9-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-classads-8.8.9-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-external-libs-8.8.9-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-procd-8.8.9-1.el7.x86_64 >> htcondor-ce-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-apel-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-bdii-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-client-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-condor-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-view-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> python2-condor-8.8.9-1.el7.x86_64 >> >> [Condor CE working] >> condor-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-classads-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-external-libs-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> condor-procd-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> htcondor-ce-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-apel-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-bdii-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-client-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-condor-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> htcondor-ce-view-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch >> python2-condor-8.9.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> >> >> On 15/07/2020 20.31, MÃtyÃs Selmeci wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> What are the versions of condor and condor-ce on each machine? >>> >>> -Mat >>> >>> On 7/15/20 10:23 AM, Thomas Hartmann wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I have spawned a new CondorCE instance based on a working puppet >>>> manifest - but condor_ce_trace fails to connect to the CE schedd. So >>>> the >>>> puppet manifest might be incomplete with something I forgot to add to >>>> the manifest :-/ >>>> >>>> On the broken CE, I see the client's request in the Collector [1] - >>>> which differs from the working CE by >>>> ÂÂÂ filter_private_ads=1 >>>> in the Query info and then >>>> ÂÂ (Sending 0 ads in response to query) [broken] >>>> vs. >>>> ÂÂ (Sending 1 ads in response to query) [working] >>>> >>>> I guess that the 1 class ad returned to the client is some kind of ACK, >>>> that is not returned in the broken case, or? >>>> >>>> The condor-ce/condor config files are the same on both machines, so >>>> that >>>> I am a bit lost here, what breaks the new instance? >>>> Maybe some port or so I forgot about?? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> ÂÂ Thomas >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> 07/15/20 16:39:54 (Sending 1 ads in response to query) >>>> 07/15/20 16:39:54 Query includes collector's self ad >>>> 07/15/20 16:39:54 Updating collector stats using a chained ad and >>>> config= >>>> 07/15/20 16:39:54 Query info: matched=1; skipped=0; >>>> query_time=0.000117; >>>> send_time=0.000237; type=Collector; requirements={((true))}; locate=0; >>>> limit=0; from=TOOL; peer=<131.169.223.90:33765>; projection={} >>>> 07/15/20 16:39:54 Got QUERY_SCHEDD_ADS >>>> 07/15/20 16:39:54 (Sending 0 ads in response to query) >>>> 07/15/20 16:39:54 Query info: matched=0; skipped=0; >>>> query_time=0.000022; >>>> send_time=0.000029; type=Scheduler; >>>> requirements={((stricmp(Name,"grid-htcondorce0.desy.de") == 0))}; >>>> locate=1; limit=0; from=TOOL; peer=<131.169.223.90:43887>; >>>> projection={MyAddress AddressV1 CondorVersion CondorPlatform Name >>>> Machine} >>>> >>>> >>>> [2] >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 (Sending 1 ads in response to query) >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 Query includes collector's self ad >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 Updating collector stats using a chained ad and >>>> config= >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 Query info: matched=1; skipped=0; >>>> query_time=0.000101; >>>> send_time=0.000362; type=Collector; requirements={((true))}; locate=0; >>>> limit=0; from=TOOL; peer=<131.169.223.90:41934>; projection={}; >>>> filter_private_ads=1 >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 Got QUERY_SCHEDD_ADS >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 (Sending 1 ads in response to query) >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 Query info: matched=1; skipped=0; >>>> query_time=0.000056; >>>> send_time=0.000061; type=Scheduler; >>>> requirements={((stricmp(Name,"grid-vm08.desy.de") == 0))}; locate=1; >>>> limit=0; from=TOOL; peer=<131.169.223.90:40257>; projection={MyAddress >>>> AddressV1 CondorVersion CondorPlatform Name Machine}; >>>> filter_private_ads=1 >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:16 SECMAN: Succesfully sent DC_SEC_QUERY classad to >>>> <131.169.223.90:33652>! >>>> AuthorizationSucceeded = true >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:19 (Sending 0 ads in response to query) >>>> 07/15/20 16:36:19 Query info: matched=0; skipped=0; >>>> query_time=0.000090; >>>> send_time=0.000039; type=Negotiator; requirements={true}; locate=0; >>>> limit=0; from=COLLECTOR; peer=<131.169.223.234:7993>; projection={}; >>>> filter_private_ads=0 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> HTCondor-users mailing list >>>> To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> with a >>>> subject: Unsubscribe >>>> You can also unsubscribe by visiting >>>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users >>>> >>>> The archives can be found at: >>>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/ >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HTCondor-users mailing list >>> To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> with a >>> subject: Unsubscribe >>> You can also unsubscribe by visiting >>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users >>> >>> The archives can be found at: >>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/ >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HTCondor-users mailing list >> To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx >> with a >> subject: Unsubscribe >> You can also unsubscribe by visiting >> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users >> >> The archives can be found at: >> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/ > > _______________________________________________ > HTCondor-users mailing list > To unsubscribe, send a message to htcondor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a > subject: Unsubscribe > You can also unsubscribe by visiting > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/htcondor-users > > The archives can be found at: > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/htcondor-users/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature