[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HTCondor-users] sanity check on preemption
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 10:50:29 -0500 (CDT)
- From: Todd L Miller <tlmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [HTCondor-users] sanity check on preemption
And I'm 80% sure the job wasn't matching the slots. I guess the other
question, suppose a job request is less than a slot, as in 4cpu/32G RAM
and there is a slot with 8cpu/64G would it consider that a match?
Yes. (There's some configuration possible to make it more likely
the job will run on another, smaller slot. If your negotiator is lightly
loaded, and you don't mind increased latency in starting jobs, you can
experiment with setting CLAIM_WORKLIFE = 0, which will force the creation
of new dynamic slots for each job. This may increase the need for
draining.)
- ToddM