As a side node, while trying and debugging various preemption requirements I faced this weird error message: 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: 52 --> 52 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.00882ms] ClusterId --> 52 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: 7 --> 7 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.00715ms] ProcId --> 7 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: "51.2" --> 51.2 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.00715ms] JobId --> 51.2 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.00119ms] RemoteUserPrio --> 2339.86 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: SubmitterUserPrio --> 1.56091e+07 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.00119ms] 0 --> 0 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.00906ms] TotalSlotGpus --> 0 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: 1 --> 1 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.00906ms] RequestGpus --> 1 04/09/20 12:25:48 Classad debug: [0.10991ms] (ClusterId > 0 && ProcId > 0 && JobId isnt "") && (((RemoteUserPrio > SubmitterUserPrio * 1.200000000000000E+00) && -(TotalSlotGpus isnt 0) && -(RequestGpus is 0)) || -(TotalSlotGpus isnt 0) || ((RequestGpus is 0) && -(TotalSlotGpus isnt 0))) --> ERROR (attribute LastNegotiationCycleMatchRateSustained99 not found to be deleted) True, the first three conditions are just for me staying sane^W^Wdebugging the expression, but this is not what ought to happen right? Weird thing, this throws an error: 04/09/20 13:02:21 Classad debug: [0.17381ms] (((RemoteUserPrio > SubmitterUserPrio * 1.200000000000000E+00) && ( -(TotalSlotGpus isnt 0)) && ( -(RequestGpus is 0))) || ( -(TotalSlotGpus isnt 0)) || ((RequestGpus is 0) && ( -(TotalSlotGpus isnt 0)))) && (ClusterId > 0 && ProcId > 0 && JobId isnt "") --> ERROR (attribute LastNegotiationCycleMatchRateSustained99 not found to be deleted) I have yet to find which expression is triggering this, any help appreciated :) Cheers Carsten -- Dr. Carsten Aulbert, Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, CallinstraÃe 38, 30167 Hannover, Germany Phone: +49 511 762 17185
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature