Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[HTCondor-users] better-analyze bug?
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 14:47:15 -0800
- From: Stuart Anderson <sba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [HTCondor-users] better-analyze bug?
Is it a bug or a feature that condor_q -better-analyze (version 8.8.6) drops "!", e.g.,
Requirements = !regexp("Intel.*Gold 6254", TARGET.cpuinfo_model_name)
Slots
Step Matched Condition
----- -------- ---------
[0] 48 regexp("Intel.*Gold 6254",TARGET.cpuinfo_model_name)
[1] 17847 TARGET.Arch == "X86_64"
[2] 17799 [0] && [1]
[5] 16739 TARGET.Disk >= RequestDisk
[6] 16729 [2] && [5]
[7] 16769 TARGET.Memory >= RequestMemory
[8] 15692 [6] && [7]
Line [0] is strictly true for this pool, but not the Condition being used in line [2] (pun intended).
Thanks.
--
Stuart Anderson
sba@xxxxxxxxxxx