Re: [Condor-users] Condor negotiator ignoring accounting groups?

[Sarah Williams <saewill@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Steven,

I don't have it for the same time, but right now it shows:
                                    Effective   Real     Priority   Res
  Total Usage       Usage            Last
User Name                           Priority  Priority    Factor    Used
(wghted-hrs)    Start Time       Usage Time
------------------------------      --------- -------- ------------ ----
 ----------- ---------------- ----------------
usatlas4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                 0.50     0.50         1.00    0
      129.10  3/22/2011 13:14  1/16/2012 10:46
usatlas2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                 0.50     0.50         1.00    0
      182.63  7/01/2011 11:32  1/16/2012 19:47
usatlas1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              3134.14  3134.14         1.00  637
  4092916.34  5/16/2011 14:10  1/17/2012 09:32
<none>                                3134.16  3134.16         1.00  637
  4116679.40  5/16/2011 14:10  1/17/2012 09:32
group_opport.engage@xxxxxxxxxx       15667.49   156.67       100.00  139
   561988.91  7/21/2011 10:37  1/17/2012 09:32
group_opport                       1693033.25   169.30     10000.00  139
  1031649.92  5/25/2011 08:33  1/17/2012 09:32
------------------------------      --------- -------- ------------ ----
 ----------- ---------------- ----------------
Number of users: 4                                                   776
  4655216.92  3/22/2011 13:14  1/16/2012 09:32

All of those usatlas1 jobs should be in group_atlasprod or
group_atlasanaly.  My best guess right now is that the quoting really is
the issue, and I'm working to get them submitting as quoted strings.

--Sarah


On 1/12/12 2:44 PM, Steven Timm wrote:
> Do you have the output of condor_userprio -all
> for that same time?
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Sarah Williams wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using condor 7.6.0-1 on a cluster with 4252 job slots. I have the
>> following accounting groups configured:
>> GROUP_NAMES = group_opport, group_atlasprod, group_dzero,
>> group_atlasinstall, group_atlasanaly
>> GROUP_QUOTA_group_dzero = 20
>> GROUP_QUOTA_group_opport = 200
>> GROUP_QUOTA_group_atlasprod = 1650
>> GROUP_QUOTA_group_atlasinstall = 1
>> GROUP_QUOTA_group_atlasanaly = 2477
>> GROUP_PRIO_FACTOR_group_opport = 500
>> GROUP_PRIO_FACTOR_group_atlasprod = 10
>> GROUP_PRIO_FACTOR_group_atlasinstall = 99
>> GROUP_PRIO_FACTOR_group_atlasanaly = 9
>> GROUP_PRIO_FACTOR_group_dzero = 1000
>> GROUP_ACCEPT_SURPLUS = TRUE
>> GROUP_AUTOREGROUP_group_dzero = FALSE
>> GROUP_AUTOREGROUP_group_opport = FALSE
>>
>> We're currently running ~3600 jobs in the atlasprod group, and ~470 jobs
>> in the atlasanaly group.  I would expect that the next jobs to run would
>> be atlasanaly. However, I find that the negotiator is instead starting
>> atlasprod jobs.  I attached an excerpt from the Negotiator log for one
>> such cycle.  The four jobs that were started that cycle were all
>> atlasprod.
>>
>> Any ideas why that's happening? It seems like from the log that is
>> completely ignoring the accounting group, even though I can see that the
>> accounting group is set in the job classad.  I am seeing a difference
>> that the group_opport attribute is quoted, while the atlas ones are not:
>> AccountingGroup = group_atlasprod.usatlas1
>> AccountingGroup = "group_opport.engage"
>>
>>
>> --Sarah
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
> timm@xxxxxxxx  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
> Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities,
> Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Group Leader.
> Lead of FermiCloud project.
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
> subject: Unsubscribe
> You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
> 
> The archives can be found at:
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/