Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Condor-users] condor_q -better-analyze has a strange condition....
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
- From: Rob <spamrefuse@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Condor-users] condor_q -better-analyze has a strange condition....
Hi,
I have a job, which does not start on the condor pool.
When I do a 'condor_q -better-analyze', I see conditions that
I can't trace where they come from:
====================================================
109.000: Run analysis summary. Of 3 machines,
1 are rejected by your job's requirements
2 reject your job because of their own requirements
0 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
0 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
0 match but are currently offline
0 are available to run your job
No successful match recorded.
Last failed match: Tue Jul 13 10:50:19 2010
Reason for last match failure: no match found
The Requirements expression for your job is:
( ( target.Arch == "INTEL" ) && ( target.OpSys == "WINNT51" ) &&
( target.Name != "skku-pc" ) ) && ( target.Disk >= DiskUsage ) &&
( ( ( target.Memory * 1024 ) >= ImageSize ) &&
( ( RequestMemory * 1024 ) >= ImageSize ) ) && ( target.HasFileTransfer )
Condition Machines Matched Suggestion
--------- ---------------- ----------
1 ( ( ( 1024 * target.Memory ) >= 27500 ) && ( ( 1024 *
ceiling(ifThenElse(JobVMMemory isnt
undefined,JobVMMemory,2.685546875000000E+01)) ) >= 27500 ) )
0 REMOVE
2 ( target.Name != "skku-pc" ) 2
3 ( target.Arch == "INTEL" ) 3
4 ( target.OpSys == "WINNT51" ) 3
5 ( target.Disk >= 27500 ) 3
6 ( target.HasFileTransfer ) 3
====================================================
Conditions no 2 to 6 I understand; they are in my condor submit file.
However, where does Condition no. 1 come from?
I searched:
* condor_config and rcondor_config.local on the master, but to no avail.
* the output of 'condor_status -long', but also nothing there.
Is this condition some hard-coded rule in the software?
I'd like to understand this issue.
Thank you!
Rob.