Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Condor-users] condor_status -direct hostname : why can't I use IP number instead of hostname?
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
- From: Rob <spamrefuse@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Condor-users] condor_status -direct hostname : why can't I use IP number instead of hostname?
Hello,
The condor_status command seems to have some delay between
what it reports and the actual status of the machine. I suppose this
has to do with certain update times. Which ones?
Is it true that I can circumvent the delay with the "-direct hostname" flag?
If so, this does not work nicely in my condor pool network.
For example:
$ condor_status -any
MyType TargetType Name
DaemonMaster None 23-4
Machine Job slot1@23-4
Machine Job slot2@23-4
$ condor_status
Name OpSys Arch State Activity LoadAv Mem ActvtyTime
slot1@23-4 WINNT51 INTEL Unclaimed Idle 0.050 1010 0+00:25:04
slot2@23-4 WINNT51 INTEL Unclaimed Idle 0.000 1010 0+00:25:05
Total Owner Claimed Unclaimed Matched Preempting Backfill
INTEL/WINNT51 2 0 0 2 0 0 0
Total 2 0 0 2 0 0 0
The "23-4" is not a proper hostname of this PC, as it does not work in the -direct flag.
When I try the IP-number instead, it also does not work:
$ condor_status -direct 23-4
condor_status: unknown host 23-4
$ condor_status -direct "23-4"
condor_status: unknown host 23-4
$ condor_status -direct 10.1.1.37
condor_status: Can't find address for startd 10.1.1.37
$ condor_status -direct "10.1.1.37"
condor_status: Can't find address for startd 10.1.1.37
This is peculiar; why can't I use the IP number here?
========================
Now, on my linux master PC, I can add an entry into the /etc/hosts file:
23-4 10.1.1.37
Then the "condor_status -direct 23-4" works!!!
This is rather inconvenient though; because pool PCs automatically hook
up to the condor network, but in order to make the "-direct" work, the root user
must modify the /etc/hosts file for every new PC in the pool.......
Why does this not work with the IP number?
Isn't a hostname merely a neat camouflage of the IP number?
==============================
Or is there another way to make the IP number work with the -direct flag?
Thanks,
Rob.