Re: [Condor-users] Quill vs. Quill++

["Robert E. Parrott" <parrott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the responses, folks.

Can a Condor team member confirm this, and suggest an approach to  
moving forward with implementing Quill on our systems?

If the schemas really are different, then I have some concerns about  
using quill in the present stable series.

We hope to be using condor and quill into the future, but need some  
insight for planning.


Thanks,
rob


On Oct 24, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Ian Chesal wrote:

> > As I understand it, there is "Quill" and there's "Quill++" which
> > talks to all condor daemons and not just schedd. What is the status
> > of Quill++, and where would one find it.
>
> As I understand it the next generation of Quill (is it still being
> called Quill++?) is a 6.9.x project right now. The daemon is the  
> same in
> both cases (condor_quill). You just use configuration variables to  
> take
> it from logging the schedd queues to logging everything in the system.
>
> > Also, Quill is included in v6.8.6 and v6.9.4. What is the difference
> > in codebase there as far as Quill is concerned?
>
> See above.
>
> - Ian
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice.  This message may contain information that  
> is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that  
> any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
> or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly  
> prohibited.  If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message  
> and any attachments.  Thank you.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx  
> with a
> subject: Unsubscribe
> You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
>
> The archives can be found at:
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/