Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] set number of virtual machines more than number of physical processors
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0400
- From: "Yu Fu" <yfu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] set number of virtual machines more than number of physical processors
And I see something like this for the first 4 processors in StarterLog:
10/11 13:32:12 vm4: State change: received RELEASE_CLAIM command
10/11 13:32:12 vm4: Changing state and activity: Claimed/Idle ->
Preempting/Vacating
10/11 13:32:12 vm4: State change: No preempting claim, returning to owner
10/11 13:32:12 vm4: Changing state and activity: Preempting/Vacating ->
Owner/Idle
10/11 13:32:12 vm4: State change: IS_OWNER is false
10/11 13:32:12 vm4: Changing state: Owner -> Unclaimed
10/11 13:32:12 DaemonCore: Command received via UDP from host
<10.13.32.11:47991>
10/11 13:32:12 DaemonCore: received command 443 (RELEASE_CLAIM), calling
handler (command_release_claim)
10/11 13:32:12 Error: can't find resource with ClaimId
(<10.13.33.60:48942>#1160586887#27)
as a result, jobs can not be run on these processors. What could be the
reason?
Thanks,
Yu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yu Fu" <yfu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Condor-Users Mail List" <condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Condor-users] set number of virtual machines more than number
of physical processors
Thanks. I tried it and got 6 processors reported in condor_status as
expected. However I only see StarterLog.vm* files for vm1~vm4 in the log
directory and there is no StarterLog.vm* for vm5 and vm6. And I can't see
activity logs for vm5 and vm6 in the mian StarterLog file. Is this normal
or did I miss something?
Thanks,
Yu
----- Original Message -----
From: "David A. Kotz" <dkotz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Condor-Users Mail List" <condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Condor-users] set number of virtual machines more than
number of physical processors
The NUM_CPUS macro allows you to override the detected number of
processors like so:
NUM_CPUS = 8
Yu Fu wrote:
Is it possible to set number of virtual machines more than number of the
actual physical processors in a machines? If so, how to do it?
Thanks,
Yu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with
a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
The archives can be found at either
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
http://www.opencondor.org/spaces/viewmailarchive.action?key=CONDOR
_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
The archives can be found at either
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
http://www.opencondor.org/spaces/viewmailarchive.action?key=CONDOR