Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] hawkeye on dual-processor nodes
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:29:09 -0500
- From: Junjun Mao <jmao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] hawkeye on dual-processor nodes
Hi Nick,
You explained it very well, and I could get rid of the extra node by
setting NUM_CPUS = 2. The problem is these vms are changing unclaimed
to owner too often.
I am running collector daemon on central manager only and I didn't
install hawkeye on the central manager. Can you be more specific on
"start a second collector, and point all of the hawkeye startds at it."?
My understanding is to run two Collectors on the central manager, but
how do I ask execute nodes to report to one Collector daemon, and how
will this help?
Junjun
> In general, you want to have your hawkeye startds reporting to their
> own separate collector. This prevents the hawkeye startd ad from
> clobbering the condor machine ad. In your case, because you're
> running on an MP machine, the hawkeye configuration has a default
> "NUM_CPUS = 1", so that's why you see the "node74" and the
> "vmx@node74" side by side. On a single CPU machine, you'd only see
> the "node74" ads, but they'd sometimes be from the condor startd,
> and, at other times, from the hawkeye startd -- this is most
> certainly not what you want.
>
> So, bottom line, start a second collector, and point all of the
> hawkeye startds at it.