Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Problems with visualizing
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:30:24 -0600
- From: dietz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Problems with visualizing
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:00:45 -0800, David E. Konerding wrote
> Alexander Dietz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to try to visualize a condor DAG with this dot-procedure as
> > described in the manual, but I mostly get a weird graph in the end. I
> > am using the file test0.dot (attached) and generate the graph with
> > 'dot -Tps test0.dot -o test.ps'. I also get a lot of warnings:
> >
> > ....
> > Warning: test.dot:61: ambiguous "7590f" splits into two names: "7590"
> > and "f"
> > Warning: test.dot:62: ambiguous "54d" splits into two names: "54" and "d"
> > Warning: test.dot:62: ambiguous "5c" splits into two names: "5" and "c"
> > Warning: test.dot:63: ambiguous "8378ec" splits into two names: "8378"
> > and "ec"
> > Warning: test.dot:64: ambiguous "28b" splits into two names: "28" and
> > "b".
> > ....
> >
> > Is there any easy way to create a sensful graph from the data given?
> >
> > Regards
> > Alexander Dietz
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > digraph DAG {
> > label="DAGMan Job status at Fri Mar 10 12:46:30 2006";
> >
> > 7ac7706952dbd210b7ee6e16be97ab2e [shape=ellipse
label="7ac7706952dbd210b7ee6e16be97ab2e (I)"];
> >
>
> It's pretty obvious: the string parsing routines in dot tokenize on
> character/number transitions (hence the warnings
> about splitting into two names). The code should be placing quotes
> around the node labels, ala:
now it is working! I can create a ps-file!
But I hardly can see the picture. It's extremely broad and it still looks
scewed up (some of the ellipses are not connected). Can I specify some option
to 'dot' to create a letter-format picture or something like that? How shall I
go to print it? I tried to convert it into a pdf, but this showed only a very
small fraction of the entire DAG (three jobs out of about 20). Any ideas?
Regards
Alexander Dietz