Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Do "slave" machines in a Condor pool need 80MB of sw?
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:46:58 -0600
- From: Nick LeRoy <nleroy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Do "slave" machines in a Condor pool need 80MB of sw?
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 5:06 pm, Matt England wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a Condor newbie, and I'm curious:
>
> Do "slave" machines in a Condor pool need 80MB of sw?
What define as a "slave" machine? An execute-only host? A submit-only host?
A submit + execute host?
> I'm finding that the Linux rpms (for 6.7.x) are 80MB big. Do I need to
> download that entire rpm file to every Linux machine that needs to be in a
> Condor pool? It seems rather large, and I would hope the "slave" machines
> (to the Condor "master server") would not need as much software.
Currently, we have just one big rpm. I suppose that you could repackage it
into a smaller submet (depending on your needs), but that's not currently
planned for in a Condor release.
Hmm, thinking about this a bit further. We could split it into multiple
packages like "condor-core" "condor-execute" "condor-execute_standard"
"condor-execute_vanilla" "condor-submit" "condor-submit_standard"
"condor-submit_vanilla" "condor-central_manager", "condor-compile"... As you
can see, this could rapidly become quite a maze of packages.
> My apologies if this is an already-answered faq.
No problem,
> -Matt
-Nick
--
<<< Why, oh, why, didn't I take the blue pill? >>>
/`-_ Nicholas R. LeRoy The Condor Project
{ }/ http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~nleroy http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor
\ / nleroy@xxxxxxxxxxx The University of Wisconsin
|_*_| 608-265-5761 Department of Computer Sciences