[Condor-users] new user to condor

["priya" <pacharya@xxxxxxx>]

hye all,
im a new user to Condor....i have downloaded condor 6.6.7 version...now for
installation ...i run condor_install ..then while following the
instructions..i
i opted full installation...then in the ques regarding setting  of condor
for multiple machines...i opted 'no'...
Can  condor run on a single machine...provided that machine to be central
manager?..
what other changes should be made for this to work??
plz help me regarding this...if anybody has any idea....
Thanks & regards
Priyadarshini

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <rnayar@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Condor-Users Mail List" <condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Alexander Lincoln
Read" <a.l.read@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 1:03 AM
Subject: [Condor-users] MPI - What the heck does this mean?


> Hey everyone, I've been mucking around with the parallel universe and i
tried
> the sleeping basic program as indicated in the manual:
>
> #############################################
> ##   submit description file for parallel program
> #############################################
> universe = parallel
> executable = /bin/sleep
> arguments = 30
> machine_count = 2
> queue
>
> Anyhow after the job completed I got an email that stated the following:
>
> From: condor
> Message-Id: <200001011014.e01AESvB003893@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: condor@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Condor] Condor Job 43.0
>
> This is an automated email from the Condor system
> on machine "panndaa.nmsu.edu".  Do not reply.
>
> Your Condor-MPI job 43.0 has completed.
>
> Here are the machines that ran your MPI job.
> They are listed in the order they were started
> in, which is the same as MPI_Comm_rank.
>
>     Machine Name               Result
>  ------------------------    -----------
>          panndaa.nmsu.edu    exited normally with status 0
>            gutti.nmsu.edu    was removed by the user
>
> Have a nice day.
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Questions about this message or Condor in general?
> Email address of the local Condor administrator: condor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The Official Condor Homepage is http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor
>
> So I was like, interesting but shouldn't "both" jobs exit with a status 0?
> Anyone have any ideas whats going on? Below is the local config file for
gutti.
> It is pretty much your general run of the mill
> condor_config.local.dedicated.resource modification.
>
> DedicatedScheduler = "DedicatedScheduler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> START           = True
> SUSPEND         = False
> CONTINUE        = True
> PREEMPT         = False
> KILL            = False
> WANT_SUSPEND    = False
> WANT_VACATE     = False
> RANK            = Scheduler =?= $(DedicatedScheduler)
> MPI_CONDOR_RSH_PATH = $(LIBEXEC)
> CONDOR_SSHD = /usr/sbin/sshd
> CONDOR_SSH_KEYGEN = /usr/bin/ssh-keygen
> STARTD_EXPRS = $(STARTD_EXPRS), DedicatedScheduler
>
> Well if anyone knows whats up or has run into this problem let me know..
Also
> its weird.. even when there is nothing being executed my machines stay in
the
> claimed state odd....
>
> Name          OpSys       Arch   State      Activity   LoadAv Mem
ActvtyTime
>
> gutti.nmsu.ed LINUX       INTEL  Claimed    Idle       0.000   495[?????]
> panndaa.nmsu. LINUX       INTEL  Claimed    Idle       1.110   503
0+00:03:36
>
>                      Machines Owner Claimed Unclaimed Matched Preempting
>
>          INTEL/LINUX        2     0       2         0       0          0
>
>                Total        2     0       2         0       0          0
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Danny Nayar
> New Mexico State University
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users