Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] COD "super user" ?
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:45:10 -0500
- From: Maarten Ballintijn <maartenb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] COD "super user" ?
Hi,
Thanks. Yes, the "reading" side needs to flush its directory cache, e.g
by doing a mkdir() or such. Not doing that is a bug, would it be
possible to fix that in 6.6 as well?
Thanks,
Maarten.
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 17:36, Zachary Miller wrote:
> >
> > What is wrong with FS_REMOTE_DIR as authentication method?
>
> i'm assuming you are using NFS for the shared directory.
>
> it's a syncing problem. the server asks the client to write a file in the
> FS_REMOTE_DIR. the client does so, and then notifies the server. then the
> server checks the owner of the file.
>
> now, they way that NFS works, the file sometimes isn't there from the
> clients point of view. we could add some sleep(), but that doesn't scale
> well. i believe daniel forrest proposed an idea on this list several
> months ago that would do the correct thing, but it hasn't been implemented
> yet. i should really add that to our 6.7.X series.
>
> so basically, FS_REMOTE will work sometimes, but not all the time, and it's
> espeically bad when there's a load on your NFS server.
>
>
> cheers,
> -zach
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
--
Maarten Ballintijn <maartenb@xxxxxxx>
Massachusetts Institute of Technology