Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Condor-users] Can Condor create more than one VM onsingleprocessor machines?
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:38:59 +0100
- From: "Kewley, J \(John\)" <j.kewley@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Condor-users] Can Condor create more than one VM onsingleprocessor machines?
Surely Condor will still assume there are 2 processors sharing the memory.
If you have 1Gb memory, it will "split" this between the 2, and although I think
your jobs could probably run on VM1 and go over that, jobs with a memory requirement
of > 1/2 Mb would not get matched.
JK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Miguel Dilaj
> Sent: 06 July 2005 17:30
> To: 'Condor-Users Mail List'
> Subject: RE: [Condor-users] Can Condor create more than one VM
> onsingleprocessor machines?
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Well... To be honest I don't think we have MANY SMP boxes. We
> need to power
> of using many machines, but I don't particularly care about each CPU.
> I think that my requirements will become:
>
> Requirements = ( (OpSys == "WINNT50") || (OpSys ==
> "WINNT51") ) &&
> (VirtualMachineID == 1)
>
> and that should be enough.
> Thanks for all the answers!
>
> Miguel
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt Hope
> Sent: 06 July 2005 17:19
> To: Condor-Users Mail List
> Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Can Condor create more than one VM on
> singleprocessor machines?
>
>
> On 7/6/05, Miguel Dilaj <mdilaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I spotted vm1 and vm2 in a couple boxes, and according to
> IT there're
> > no dual-processor boxes there (but they can be mistaken).
>
> Guess:
>
> those machines have HyperThreading enabled.
>
> suggestion -
> 1) get it switched off in the BIOS.
> 2) set NUM_CPUS = 1
> 3) set NUM_VIRTUAL_MACHINES = 1
> 4) set COUNT_HYPERTHREAD_CPUS = false
>
> I suggest 4 as the cleanest while still let HT stay on but 1
> as the safeest
> (If you don't know about the HT state on a cluster you likely
> don't want it)
>
> If instead you are luckyeenough to have some dual core
> machines then enjoy
> having the additional cpu power witbhout the power tradeoffs.
> If network or
> disk bandwidth is more important use option 3 to only have one vm per
> machine
>
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
>
>
> **************************************************************
> *********************************************
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This e-mail contains proprietary information, some or all of
> which may be legally privileged.
> It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing or
> transmission error has misdirected this e-mail,
> please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you
> are not the intended recipient you may not use,
> disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail.
>
> **************************************************************
> *********************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
>