Resending this, but this time I'm compressing vmtracker.out so it makes it past the max post size limit. - Ian > Man! I'll my machines are reporting LastHeardFrom around > 1105117918 seconds! Is that seconds from epoch maybe? That > might make more sense. I've only had the cluster running for > a few months, not umm...35 years. The LastHeardFrom and > EnteredCurrentState and EnteredCurrentActivity are pretty > close to each other so I'm getting updates as job state is changing. > > I ran a monitor last night and dumped out the output from: > > condor_status -f "%s\t" JobId -f "%s\t" Name -f "%s\t" > RemoteUser -f "%s\t" Acti vity -f "%d\t" VirtualMemory -f > "%d\n" ImageSize -const 'State=="Claimed"' > > every five minutes. > > The available virtual memory never moves for any of the > machines running jobs. It's always fixed at the total amount > of virtual memory for the machine. And I've got some big jobs > in there. 1GB++ in memory consumption. I've attached > vmtracker.out so you can see for yourselves. I would have > expected this number to dip by more than a little as two > 1GB++ jobs churned away on a machine. > > - Ian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Weber > > Sent: January 7, 2005 11:23 AM > > To: Condor-Users Mail List > > Subject: RE: [Condor-users] Is VirtualMemory updated at intervals? > > > > Ian. > > > > Dynamic. > > > > Monitor the LastHeardFrom attribute for this machine from the > > "condor_status -l" > > command output and verify you are indeed receiving fresh > machineAds. > > The time unit is seconds. > > > > Jeff > > > > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:20, Ian Chesal wrote: > > > I really want to believe you but this goes against my > > observations. My > > > machines are constantly reporting the full amount of VM > for the box > > > regardless of what's running on them. And I'm running so > > very memory > > > intensive apps. Not so much as a twitch in the amount of VM > > reported > > > by the vm's on the box. Is it clipped for the Win32 version > > of condor? > > > > > > - Ian > > > > > > > virtual memory is dynamically updated by the startd. > > > > > > > > Jeff > > > > Condor Team > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:21, Ian Chesal wrote: > > > > > I don't suppose someone from the Condor team could > ring on this > > > > > question? I haven't heard from any one... > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > - Ian > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian > > > > > > Chesal > > > > > > Sent: December 22, 2004 4:20 PM > > > > > > To: Condor-Users Mail List > > > > > > Subject: [Condor-users] Is VirtualMemory updated at > intervals? > > > > > > > > > > > > Page 24 in section 2.5 of the 6.7.2 manual says that > > > > VirtualMemory > > > > > > is "The amount of currently available virtual memory" for > > > > a machine. > > > > > > I'm running non-Condor processes that are, according to > > > > my machine, > > > > > > eating up just about all of the virtual memory on the > > > > machine. But > > > > > > when I do: > > > > > > > > > > > > condor_status -f "%d\n" virtualmemory <machine> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm seeing the same number (about 1 GB) reported > despite the > > > > > > fact that the OS says there is not 1 GB of available virtual > > > > memory. This > > > > > > is 6.7.2 on Windows XP. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the VirtualMemory figure for a machine a static or > > > > dynamic value? > > > > > > That entry in the manual led me to believe it was > > > > dynamically updated. > > > > -- > > Jeff Weber > > University of Wisconsin, Madison > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Condor-users mailing list > > Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users > > >
Attachment:
vmtracker.out.gz
Description: vmtracker.out.gz