Re: [Condor-users] Is this Rank statement correct

[Dan Bradley <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Your expressions look good to me, so long as LEADER, MAJOR_GROUP, and 
MINOR_GROUP are added to STARTD_EXPRS.  The alternative is to substitute 
them directly into the RANK expression by using the macro expansion 
syntax (e.g. $(LEADER)).

--Dan

Daniel Loughlin wrote:

> -------- begin snip --------
> LEADER = Owner == "bob"
> MAJOR_GROUP = Owner == "bobby" || Owner == "rob"
> MINOR_GROUP = Owner == "mod" || Owner == "dob"
>
> SUSPEND = Scheduler =!= $(DedicatedScheduler) && ($(SUSPEND))
> PREEMPT = Scheduler =!= $(DedicatedScheduler) && ($(PREEMPT))
> RANK_FACTOR     = 1000000
> RANK    = (LEADER * 30) + (MAJOR_GROUP * 20) + (MINOR_GROUP * 10)
> RANK    = (Scheduler =?= $(DedicatedScheduler) * $(RANK_FACTOR)) + 
> $(RANK)
> START   = (Scheduler =?= $(DedicatedScheduler)) || ($(START))
> --------- end snip -----------
>
> The point of the above condor_config.local is to favor jobs from 
> LEADER, then MAJOR_GROUP, then MINOR_GROUP, and finally everyone else. 
> However, jobs needing a dedicated scheduler take precedence above 
> everyone.
>
> Is the above correct, for what I want to accomplish?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users