RE: [Condor-users] condor on windows server 2003

["Bryan S. Maher" <Bryan.Maher@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> ...then Condor would behave as you described.

Sorry, that is what I was implying but should have been more clear.

-----Original Message-----
From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Colin Stolley
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:03 PM
To: Condor-Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [Condor-users] condor on windows server 2003

Bryan,

>
>I have the following in my condor_config file:
>
>	VM1_USER = MYDOMAIN\CONDOR
>	EXECUTE_LOGIN_IS_DEDICATED = TRUE
>
>According to Collin, making the login dedicated allows condor to assume
all processes in that user context belong to the job and can be managed
accordingly.  
>
Right.

> By consequence, jobs vacated by VM1 would kill jobs run by VM2.
>
Not exactly. VM1_USER is defined as MYDOMAIN\CONDOR, but VM2 is 
undefined, meaning it will use condor-reuse-vm2. If you said,

VM2_USER = MYDOMAIN\CONDOR

then Condor would behave as you described.

Colin
_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing list
Condor-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users