On Jul 11, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Todd Tannenbaum <tannenba@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So... seems like we should do something about the below. The question is what. Some options:
>
> 1. Never mount the freezer controller. If we did this, does it mean that processes in a job could "get away" from our control if the job forks quickly?
>
Yup.
> 2. Add logic in the code to not use the freezer controller if want_suspend =!= FALSE or suspend =!= false
>
I would prefer doing this until the kernel bug is resolved.
FWIW - this doesn't seem miserably hard to reproduce, although I haven't been able to reliably reproduce.
Brian
|