Re: [Condor-devel] Clang compatibility fixes

[Greg Thain <gthain@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> The attached patches are necessary to compile Condor with Clang.  Only 
> patch 2 is clearly correct (variable-length arrays are a GCC 
> extension).  Patch 1 could be Clang bug, but I don't think so.  Patch 
> 3 is odd because the comment above the ThreadInfo class definition 
> strongly suggests that there should have been an operator== in the 
> first place.

Thanks for the patches!  The first two look pretty safe, and we'll get 
them into 7.9 right away.  I think to think a bit about what we really 
want operator== to mean for our thread wrappers.

-Greg