Mailing List Archives

Authenticated access

 		[Computer Systems Lab]

[← Prev]  [Date]  [Next →] [← Prev]  [Thread]  [Next →]

[Gems-users] Banking of L1 and L2 in Opal /WATTCH

Date: 08 May 2010 15:15:39 -0500
From: ubaid001@xxxxxxx
Subject: [Gems-users] Banking of L1 and L2 in Opal /WATTCH 
Hi,
On going through the Opal/WATTCH code I have noticed that for calculating power L1 cache is considered to be banked but not L2. Any reason as to why L2 power is calculated by not considering it to be banked? 

Suhail
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]
  • [Gems-users] Banking of L1 and L2 in Opal /WATTCH, ubaid001 <=
Previous by Date:  [Gems-users] 回复： 回复： Latency and number of memory request, 张轶
Next by Date:  Re: [Gems-users] 回复： 回复： Latency and number of memory request, Dan Gibson
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Gems-users] About data prefetch, Polina Dudnik
Next by Thread:  [Gems-users] better warming up for cache, lori zhuang
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread]