Mailing List ArchivesAuthenticated access |
![[Computer Systems Lab]](http://www.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}
|
Mailing List ArchivesAuthenticated access |
|
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:41:21 +0800 |
|---|---|
| From: | mihai pricopi <mihai.pricopi@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | [Gems-users] Retire Not-Ready Reasons |
|
Hi, I would have a new question. I saw that for many simulations the most important reasons of a low IPC in my case is the "Retire ready" statistic. What would generate such a big number ? Is it the low number of functional units ? The ROB size ? The Window ? Thanks |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] Running benchmarks only with opal, mihai pricopi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Gems-users] MLP-Memory level parallelism, Muhammad abid Mughal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] proc_num, sim_proc_num,core_num, thread_num, Amy Pang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Router power is thousands Watt, Fu GuiTao |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |