Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:17:47 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor |
It is possible to use Ruby (part of GEMS) without Opal (another part of GEMS), if you choose to do so. Without Opal, GEMS models a blocking in-order core of IPC 1, less performance loss due to memory accesses. Regards, Dan On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Mahmood Naderan <mahmood.nt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Second item in key features http://www.cs.wisc.edu/gems/: -- http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq! |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |