| Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:17:47 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From: | Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor |
|
It is possible to use Ruby (part of GEMS) without Opal (another part of GEMS), if you choose to do so. Without Opal, GEMS models a blocking in-order core of IPC 1, less performance loss due to memory accesses. Regards, Dan On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Mahmood Naderan <mahmood.nt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Second item in key features http://www.cs.wisc.edu/gems/: -- http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq! |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS and in-order processor, Mahmood Naderan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |