Re: [Gems-users] Backoff code in LogTM

["Mohammad Momin Ansari" <ansari@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Kostis,

Would it be correct to suggest that moving the backoff code in  
TransactionInterfaceManager.c:restartTransactionCallback() so that it  
applies not only to XACT_LAZY_VM, and removing the backoff at the end of  
transaction.c:tm_log_unroll() would result in roughly equivalent  
functionality, i.e. wouldn't break anything?
Thanks,

--
Dr. Mohammad Ansari
Research Associate
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester, UK