Date: | Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:50:54 +0200 |
---|---|
From: | "Daniel Sánchez Pedreño" <sanatox@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] CONFIG_FETCH_THREADS_PER_CYCLE parameter in GEMS2.1 |
I would suggest for the condition:
if(num_fetched[proc] >1 ){ because if the first fetched instruction is a ITLB_MISS num_fetched[proc] would be 1 but no instructions has been really fetched. However, if the ITLB_MISS is in the second or third fetched instruction num_fetched[proc] will be greater than 1 and some instructions have been really fetched. Regards, Dani On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Daniel Sánchez Pedreño <sanatox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- http://sanatox.es |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] TLB MISS for Virtual Log Pointer, Jayaram Bobba |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] Cache Insertion, Patrick Teague |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] CONFIG_FETCH_THREADS_PER_CYCLE parameter in GEMS2.1, Luke Yen |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] Does gems2.1 work with Simics2.2.X?, Hemayet Hossain |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |