Re: [Gems-users] regAllocate() assertion when using SMT procs

["Daniel Sánchez Pedreño" <sanatox@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, but now another assert fails:

system/system.C:1790: static integer_t system_t::rubyInstructionQuery(int): Assertion `(seq_index >= 0 && seq_index < system_t::inst->m_numSMTProcs)' failed

I'm simulating a benchmark with 16 application threads with 2-thread processors; when this asser fails seq_index is equal to 8 while m_numProcs is 16 and m_numSMTProcs is 8.

I think that the problem is that Ruby should work with 8 processors instead of 16. I have solved this issue by setting the number of processors to 8 (instead of 16 and everything looks ok). Is normal that the identifier for the physical processors will be 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 for 16 application threads)?

Thank you.