Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:20:12 +1300 |
---|---|
From: | "Fuad Tabba" <fuad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] How to replicate simulation runs exactly |
I wanted to add that it might be simics that's inducing some randomness rather than gems. Running simics (without gems) with an instruction trace of a multithreaded program twice and diffing the traces shows some differences. A google search for this issue shows a result for Simics 4 being the "first deterministic multithreaded simulator".... Has anyone been able to reproduce exactly two multithreaded runs using simics/gems? I've only managed to pull that off if I'm running one processor... Thanks again. Cheers, /fuad On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Fuad Tabba <fuad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Dan (and everyone else), |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] How to replicate simulation runs exactly, Fuad Tabba |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] How to replicate simulation runs exactly, Dan Gibson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] How to replicate simulation runs exactly, Fuad Tabba |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] How to replicate simulation runs exactly, Dan Gibson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |