Re: [Gems-users] routing algorithm

[Greg Byrd <gbyrd@xxxxxxxx>]

I don't strongly disagree, but the table-driven approach is somewhat static.  I 
know that you can have alternatives in the table, and choose among them 
dynamically, but the choices are still statically determined.
Just my opinion.

...Greg


Niket Agarwal (niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > For future versions of GEMS, it would be nice if the routing 
> > function 
> > could be modularized, so that it could be more easily replaced with 
> > a 
> > non-table-driven routing algorithm.
> My feeling is that a table driven routing scheme provides more flexibility for changing the routing algorithm. One can easily change the table during configuration stage and use it as required during routing. 
>
> Cheers, 
> Niket