| Date: | Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:59:20 -0800 | 
|---|---|
| From: | "Jim Leek" <jrleek@xxxxxxxxx> | 
| Subject: | [Gems-users] logTM conflict resolution | 
| In the Pathologies paper it gives a set of the different kinds of Transactional memory styles, and they have different conflict resolution methods.  LL is committer wins, EL is Requester wins, and EE is requester stalls.  However, I don't really see these options in rubyconfig.defaults.  This is what the wiki says: XACT_EAGER_CD: (true or false) Setting to true enables eager conflict detection. Otherwise uses lazy conflict detection.XACT_LAZY_VM: (true or false) Setting to true enables lazy version management via an infinite write buffer. Otherwise uses eager version management. Must also set XACT_MEMORY to true during protocol compilation, or else appropriate Simics callbacks will not get registered. XACT_CONFLICT_RES: (BASE, TIMESTAMP, HYBRID, or CYCLE) Different policies of conflict resolution. BASE aborts the requestor whenever there's a conflict. TIMESTAMP aborts a requestor only if the requestor is younger than the conflicting processor. HYBRID aborts a younger transaction in favor of an older requesting transaction if the younger has the conflicting block in its read set only. CYCLE always indicates a conflict with other transactions, and is used to immediately trap to a software contention manager. so, if I use EE-base, does requester stall? EL's policy of requester always wins doesn't even seem to be an option? (I'm guessing that EL-base actually does this.) Thanks, Jim | 
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] CMP-DNUCA, Mike Marty | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] configuration problem installing gems 2.1, José Flich | 
| Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] jbb benchmark, wangzuo | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] logTM conflict resolution, Jayaram Bobba | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |