Re: [Gems-users] XACT_ISOLATION_CHECK

[Jayaram Bobba <bobba@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The isolation checker should report an error but will not stop the 
simulation.
($GEMS/ruby/log_tm/TransactionSimicsProcessor.C)

Irrespective of XACT_ISOLATION_CHECK, the released implementation does not
correctly handle ESCAPE stores to transactionally accessed data. Check 
out the
Nested LogTM paper (see LogTM and violations of X1, X2 and X3) for the 
correct
behavior.

Jayaram

Ricardo Quislant del Barrio wrote:
> If I'm using ESCAPE actions to access shared data while a transaction is 
> working with such data,
> should I set to FALSE the XACT_ISOLATION_CHECK property? or it will 
> operate well with isolation checker on?.
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>