Re: [Gems-users] What does the below error mean?

[Xuan Qi <xqi@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I got exact the same error when I run my simulation. Co-ask anyone could 
help us with this problem? Thanks...
Best regards,
Xuan Qi


On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Berkin Ozisikyilmaz wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am running gems 2.1 and simics 2.2.19.
>
> I run the application using the following commands, and im getting the
> errors further below.
>
> Is the error related to the order that I execute stuff in my script?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Berkin
>
>
>
> read-configuration xstart
>
> cpu-switch-time 1
>
> instruction-fetch-mode instruction-fetch-trace
>
> istc-disable
>
> dstc-disable
>
> con0.input "./example_fmodulo_sched -i ./color100 -o -d -p 16\n"
>
> con0.break "Initial"
>
> c
>
> load-module ruby
>
> ruby0.setparam g_NUM_PROCESSORS 16
>
> ruby0.setparam g_MEMORY_SIZE_BYTES 536870912
>
> ruby0.setparam g_PROCS_PER_CHIP 16
>
> ruby0.setparam g_NUM_MEMORIES 1
>
> ruby0.setparam NUMBER_OF_VIRTUAL_NETWORKS 5
>
> ruby0.init
>
> load-module opal
>
> opal0.init
>
> opal0.sim-start "output_16core-fmodulo_sched.opal"
>
> opal0.sim-step 100000000
>
>
>
> memoryBits: 0 memorySizeBits: 29 Address: [0xff164000, line
> 0xff164000]error: limit exceeded.  dataBlockBits: 6 memoryModuleBlocks:
> 8388608 index: 66869504
>
> failed assertion 'index < RubyConfig::memoryModuleBlocks()' at fn integer_t
> Address::memoryModuleIndex() const in common/Address.h:210
>
> failed assertion 'index < RubyConfig::memoryModuleBlocks()' at fn integer_t
> Address::memoryModuleIndex() const in common/Address.h:210
>
> At this point you might want to attach a debug to the running and get to the
>
> crash site; otherwise press enter to continue
>
> PID: 22157
>
>
>
> ***  Simics getting shaky, switching to 'safe' mode.
>
> ***  Simics (main thread) received an abort signal, probably an assertion.
>
> Starting command line. (May have skipped commands in script files.)