OK, I see. Thank you , Mike. I just try to follow the general design
and procedure of this protocol.
What about the prioritized VNs I asked in last email? Do you have any
idea about this?
> I am wondering has Ruby prioritized the different VNs? I remember that
> the Throttle in the network source code satisfies the bandwidth
> requirements from VN3 to VN0, which means the VN3 gets the highest
> priority, but these priorities will be inverted if the variable
> m_wakeups_wo_switch in Throttle exceeds a constant
> PRIORITY_SWITCH_LIMIT. Is there anywhere else related to the
> prioritized VNs? Why did you do that?
Thanks,
Lide
|