Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:58:10 -0700 (PDT) |
---|---|
From: | "Dave Z." <zhu_dave@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] number of hits per cache level |
You are right. Does Ruby keep track of memory requests per processor? If so, then I can subtract the number of misses per processor from that number and find the number of hits per processor. That would give me the correct number of hits per processor, right? Dave ----- Original Message ---- From: Greg Byrd <gbyrd@xxxxxxxx> To: Gems Users <gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:33:47 PM Subject: Re: [Gems-users] number of hits per cache level Some cache operations go through many transitions. Doing what you suggest would overcount hits. ...Greg Dave Z. wrote: In each cache controller, should I profile all transitions (except the ones from I state) as a hit? Would it give me the correct number of hits? Thanks. ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: Gems Users <gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 12:46:17 PM Subject: Re: [Gems-users] number of hits per cache level You can use the transition counts in the .stats file You can add profiling code to each cache controller Dave Z. wrote:Hello, How can I find out the number of hits per cache level? I would liketo find out the hit/miss ratio, therefore I need the total number of hits and misses. Would it work if I counted the number of hits in Sequencer::makeRequest? But the issue with that approach is the cache level is not specified in the request. Please show me some pointers.Thanks, Dave __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding"site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search._______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search. -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] number of hits per cache level, Greg Byrd |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] Installation Error: Compilation of Ruby and Opal - Help Needed, Dinagar Raghunathan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] number of hits per cache level, Greg Byrd |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] number of processors, Dave Z. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |