| Date: | Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:38:00 +0800 |
|---|---|
| From: | 郭锐 <timmyguo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | [Gems-users] Do you have the plan to support the Dragon protocol in GEMS? |
Dear GEMS TEAM, I recently find that a dragon protocol simulation would be beneficial to my research. And GEMS doesn't implement this. Do you have a plan on this? As far as I know, the SLICC language & compiler handles memory transaction in per-line basis. I think it's crucial for an updating protocol to handle transaction in per-word basis, which not only eliminates false sharing but also reduces bandwidth consumption. Do you have a plan to implement this? G.R. |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] Cycles, Joaquin Sanchez Sanchez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Do you have the plan to support the Dragon protocol inGEMS?, Mike Marty |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Doubt in wakeup() method, Mike Marty |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Do you have the plan to support the Dragon protocol inGEMS?, Mike Marty |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |