| Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT) | 
|---|---|
| From: | Shantanu Gupta <shangupt@xxxxxxxxx> | 
| Subject: | [Gems-users] Processor binding for LogTM | 
For correct execution of a multithreaded benchmarks using logTM protocol, 
is processor binding (pset_bind) necessary ?
If yes, then why does the deque benchmark not have it ?If no, then how is it guaranteed that a thread will be not be shuffled out of a processor while it is running under a transaction ? What is responsible for ensuring this : - logtm coherence protocol - logtm transaction manager - simics interface, etc.. -Shantanu  | 
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] debugging network, Mike Marty | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] debugging network, Dave Z. | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Problems with Ruby, Dan Gibson | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Processor binding for LogTM, Jayaram Bobba | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |