| Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT) |
|---|---|
| From: | Shantanu Gupta <shangupt@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | [Gems-users] Processor binding for LogTM |
For correct execution of a multithreaded benchmarks using logTM protocol,
is processor binding (pset_bind) necessary ?
If yes, then why does the deque benchmark not have it ?If no, then how is it guaranteed that a thread will be not be shuffled out of a processor while it is running under a transaction ? What is responsible for ensuring this : - logtm coherence protocol - logtm transaction manager - simics interface, etc.. -Shantanu |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] debugging network, Mike Marty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] debugging network, Dave Z. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Problems with Ruby, Dan Gibson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Processor binding for LogTM, Jayaram Bobba |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |