| Hi, Mike,   Thank you for your prompt reply!   Best Regards,   Hongxia SUN
 
 2007/2/1, Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I am working on the network code of ruby. And I have several questions on> it.
 >
 > Firstly, I noticed that the SimpleNetwork, the PerfectSwitch and the
 > Throttle all defined several MessageBuffer Vectors. Messages were
 > transferred among these MessageBuffers. I was wondering that the
 > MessageBuffers in PerfectSwitch and Throttle were only private copies of
 > MessageBuffer defined in SimpleNetwork or they were independent
 > MessageBuffers used to transferred messages. Were all the MessageBuffers
 > defined in *.sm files, were not they?
 >
 
 MessageBuffers are all over the place.  They are in Slicc-defined
 controllers, in Throttles, and in PerfectSwitches.  Messages traverse a
 series of MessageBuffers until they reach the endpoint.
 
 > Secondly, I noticed that when PerfectSwitch->addInPort and
 > Throttle->addLinks they set them selves as the Consumers of the
 > MessageBuffers. And when a message was enqueued to a corresponding
 > MessageBuffer, it would wakeup its Consumer. Am I right?
 >
 
 Thats correct.
 
 --Mike
 
 _______________________________________________
 Gems-users mailing list
 Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
 Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
 
 
 
 |