Yes, that's exactly what it's for. I agree, it would nice to move that out of the protocol. Thanks for the suggestion,
Kevin
On Jan 12, 2007, at 8:44 AM, ~{9y~}~{Hq~} wrote:
I'm trying to modify the LogTM protocol to fit my design. I find the trigger
UNDO_ABORT_STORE issued in Abort_delay_write confusing. Is it that Simics
will still execute the store that caused the abort? If that's the fact, I
think it should be better to move the code out of the protocol.
G.R.
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
|