Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:39:58 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | "Eirik Bakke" <ebakke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] When to invalidate instruction (trace) cache? |
Sorry, Mike, my mistake -- we are indeed implementing
the Trace Cache in Opal, not Ruby.
An equivalent question is "When is the correct time to
flush lines in the instruction cache to account for newly loaded
instructions?". The Trace Cache is just an extension of the instruction cache
that needs to flush at the same times.
-- Eirik From: gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gems-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Marty Sent: 9. desember 2007 21:10 To: Gems Users Subject: Re: [Gems-users] When to invalidate instruction (trace) cache? I could be completely wrong, but it might make sense to completely implement a trace cache in Opal instead of Ruby. --Mike On Dec 8, 2007 11:32 PM, Eirik Bakke <ebakke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: We are implementing/simulating a Trace Cache [1] in ruby. While an |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] m_L2Cache_responseFromL2Cache and deadlock, Tushar Krishna (tkrishna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] Question about making opal in GEMS 2.0, Guoqiang Yang |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] When to invalidate instruction (trace) cache?, Mike Marty |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] XACT consistency checker problem, Ricardo Quislant del Barrio |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |