| Date: | Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:03:52 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From: | Niket Agarwal <niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | [Gems-users] Deadlock avoidance in Gems |
Hello all,I wanted to figure out as to how are protocol level deadlocks avoided in Gems. For instance, if there are 3 message classes in the coherence protocol, having 3 separate networks (or virtual networks), avoids the deadlock. Gems just has a single network and no virtual channels. So, how is the deadlock avoided ? Thanks, Niket. |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] inconsistency in map_Address_to_DirectoryNode, Liqun Cheng |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Deadlock avoidance in Gems, hongxia sun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] crossbar, Mladen Nikitovic |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Deadlock avoidance in Gems, hongxia sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |